The concept of an interspecific relationship is not new - in fact, we have been dealing with one such relationship all along - a predator-prey interaction is an interspecific relationship. However, there are other interspecific relationships manifested on the Sogapalag island. While these relationships are fascinating to study as factors contributing to the predator prey interactions, the professor fears that the math involved in such a computation would be entirely over his head. Luckily, he finds several islands with sparrows and rabbits, but no weasels. We will therefore restrict our studies to include only two species. You might, however, try to discuss hypothetical implications of these relationships on rabbits, weasels, and sparrows for islands that have all three species.
41.1
A mathematical model for competition between species can be formulated as the differential equations:
VARIABLES:
We have already analyzed two cases of this model in Chapter 22 of the text.
The first, titled "competition," was written in simplified form, but equivalent to
The second case of this model was titled "Fierce Competition" and was
We have purposely written the equations with the parameters b and c times the fractions
The parameters b and c are the most difficult to explain.
You may want to think of some special cases to help.
For example, if bushes are scarce so that both rabbits and sparrows rely mostly on the same resource, grass, then rabbits may heavily affect the sparrow population, who are rendered homeless if their bush is eaten.
Sparrows may gobble grass that the bunnies can't then eat, but they will be at a disadvantage.
What sorts of choices of b and c describe this situation?
A robust island with plenty of grass and bushes will allow the species to live in separate niches.
The sparrows eat only a little grass and the rabbits eat only a few bushes.
In this case, the impact of each species on the other is smaller.
What are good choices of b and c to describe this situation?
You may want to come back to review your explanation after you have worked more on the mathematical experiments and analysis.
You should review the geometrical analysis of the two competition examples from Chapter 22 of the text.
The first example leads to coexistence of rabbits and sparrows, but the second usually leads to the extinction of one or the other, but not both.
This is "competitive exclusion," but a weak kind where the surviving species depends on the relative sizes of the two populations at the start of observation.
Some of the algebra is simpler if we rewrite the basic equations in terms of new variables,
41.2
where
Figure 41.1: Coexistence
Figure 41.2: Weak Exclusion
and
. The appetites of rabbits and sparrows are different, corresponding to their different sizes, so we want to measure the effect of a number of sparrows on the rabbits in terms of the carrying capacity of sparrows.
For example, without the other species, the environment might support 1000 sparrow couples or 400 rabbit couples per square mile.
If there are 500 sparrow couples, half the environment's capacity,
tells us the negative affect on rabbits.
All things being equal, you might expect "fair" competition to result in half rabbits and half sparrows, but a "fair" meaning to `half and half' should take the various appetites into account.
Half and half in terms of carrying capacity would mean 500 sparrow couples and 200 rabbit couples.
Begin your work on competing species by writing a biological explanation of the model for Professor Debrainman.
The parameters h and k are the carrying capacities of an island for each species when the other is absent.
Explain this to the professor by reviewing the logistic equation from Chapter 22. The parameters m and n are the intrinsic fertilities of the species, similar to the a parameter in the predator-prey model above.
Explain the coefficients b and c carefully to the professor in terms of how effectively one species competes against another.
Give the units of each parameter with your explanation.
And remember that the explanations are supposed to be as biological as possible, so that we don't terrorize the poor professor.
Use the computer program Flow2D or the CowSheep example to try some mathematical experiments with various values of the parameters.
Begin with m=n=1, h=7, k=10 and then run cases for the following islands.
Summarize your mathematical experiments in the form of some basic conjectures about the two species competition model.
What do you think the controlling mathematical factor is in determining the outcome of the competition?
The competition equations become
Prove your conjectures by making the compass heading direction fields similar to those in the text, but strictly in terms of the parameters h, k, b and c. Recall that the direction field is vertical, or dx=0, on the line 1=x/h+by/k. This line crosses the x-axis at h and the y-axis at k/b. The direction field is horizontal, or dy=0 on the line 1=cx/h+y/k. This crosses the y-axis at k and the x-axis at h/c. The relative locations of the pairs of points (h,0) and (h/c,0) and (0,k) and (0,k/b) corresponding to the four cases above can be filled in on the blank graphs in Figure 41.7 to get you started. (If you use the (u,v) dynamics, these points are (1,0) and (1/c,0) and (0,1) and (0,1/b).) Does it matter biologically whether or not the lines intersect in the second or fourth quadrant when c>1 and b<1? Are there other cases?
where f and g are coefficients for cooperation.
We may also write the equations in terms of the natural un-cooperative carrying capacities by a change of variables,
The cooperation equations become
Try some mathematical experiments with various values of the parameters.
Try modest cooperation with f=1/4 and g=1/2 and extreme cooperation with f=1.5 and g=1.25